Morton Fraser

Skip to main content

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Approach and Culture
    • Our History
    • Awards
    • The RGA Trust
    • Interlaw
    • Environmental Policy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Library
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • E-Bulletins
    • Factsheets
    • Podcasts
    • Useful links
  • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
    • Deals
    • Businesswomen's Network
  • Properties For Sale
  • Careers
    • Working at Morton Fraser
    • Equality & Diversity
    • Current Vacancies
    • Legal Traineeships
    • Work Experience
  • Blogs
    • Planning and The Environment
    • Employment Lawyer
    • Family Law
    • Business Law
    • Morton Fraser Experience
    • Real Estate Comment
    • The Olympic Games Blog
    • Banking & Finance
  • Contact Us
    • Edinburgh Office
    • Glasgow Office
    • London Office
    • Media/Press
    • Make a Payment
    • How to Find us Online
  • Our People
  • Services
  • Services
  • Sectors

Blogs

  • Planning and The Environment
  • Employment Lawyer
  • Family Law
  • Business Law
  • Morton Fraser Experience
  • Real Estate Comment
  • The Olympic Games Blog
  • Banking & Finance
 

Posted: Monday 8 February 2010

Fit Notes

The Government has published its response to the consultation on fit notes which are due to come into force in April this year.

These notes are set to replace the traditional sick note and encourage employees to get back to work. Essentially if a doctor is of the view that an employee could return to work, they can recommend adjustments which an employer could make to facilitate this. I have heard some initial views expressed that this is unlikely to make any real difference but I am not so sure.

 Under the new system:

  • The doctor can list adjustments which would facilitate a return to work. If the doctor feels another course of action would be better for the employee, the doctor can detail this in the comments section.
  • There will not be a “fit for work” option. It was felt that a doctor would not know enough about the role the employee undertakes to determine whether he is fit for work or not.
  • The “may be fit for some work” option is to be replaced with “you may be fit for work taking account of the following advice”.  It will then be for the employer and the employee to consult on whether or not it is practical for the employee to return to work. (i.e. can the employer facilitate any adjustments?)
  • In the first 6 months of an illness the medical certificates issued by the doctor will only endure for 3 month spells.
  • If the employer is not able to implement the suggested adjustments, there will be no need for a revised medical certificate. The existing certificate is sufficient evidence that the employee cannot carry out his current role.

The Government intends that detailed guidance will be available shortly for medical practitioners, employers and individuals. The Government will also launch a communication campaign to raise awareness of the changes. 

My own view is that this is likely to sharply focus the issue of reasonable adjustments which require to be taken where the employee has a disability and may lead to more litigation where a GP has expressly suggested an adjustment that can be made but where the employer has refused or has been unable to make the change.

If you are interested in this issue, please register to attend one of our free Essential Employment Law seminars.  We will cover the new “fit notes” system and also, more generally, discuss the legal and practical implications of employees being on long-term sick leave.  The seminars will be held in Glasgow on Tuesday 16 March at 8:30am to 10am and in Edinburgh on Wednesday 17 March from 5:15 pm to 6:30pm.

Tags: Absence Management, Employment Law - Employers

If you have found this content interesting please share it with your online community using the Share button. Thank you.

1 Comment

  • Jim Docherty replied on 24 Feb 2010 at 09:37

    So doctors are not able to tell when patients are unfit for work? If it's two broken legs and the patient is a tight rope walker? The employer and employee are to "consult" as to whether it is practical for the employee to return to work? That won't be any sort of problem, will it? Daft, beginning to end.

<  Return to blogs

Filter by category

  • Absence Management
  • Disciplinary Issues
  • Employment Law - Employees
  • Employment Law - Employers
  • Equality & Discrimination
  • Facts & Figures
  • Grievance Issues
  • Health & Safety
  • Miscellaneous
  • Morton Fraser Information
  • Pensions and Benefits
  • Redundancy
  • SMEs & Owner Managed Companies
  • Social Media
  • Start-Up Companies
  • The Future
  • Unfair Dismissal
 
.. .. .. .. ..
  • Linked-In
  • Twitter
  • Facebook business
  • Facebook You and your family
  • iTunes
  • EDINBURGH
    0131 247 1000
  • GLASGOW
    0141 274 1100
  • LONDON
    020 7397 8621
  • Sitemap
  • Web Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Business
  • Accessibility
  • Legal

© Morton Fraser 2012
site by tictoc