Morton Fraser

Skip to main content

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Approach and Culture
    • Our History
    • Awards
    • The RGA Trust
    • Interlaw
    • Environmental Policy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • About Us
  • Library
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • E-Bulletins
    • Factsheets
    • Podcasts
    • Useful links
  • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
    • Deals
    • Business Women's Network
  • Properties For Sale
  • Careers
    • Working at Morton Fraser
    • Equality & Diversity
    • Current Vacancies
    • Legal Traineeships
    • Work Experience
  • Blogs
    • Planning and The Environment
    • Employment Lawyer
    • Family Law
    • Austin Legal UK
    • Morton Fraser Experience
    • Real Estate Comment
    • The Olympic Games Blog
    • Banking & Finance
    • On The Move
  • Contact Us
    • Edinburgh Office
    • Glasgow Office
    • London Office
    • Media/Press
    • Make a Payment
    • How to Find us Online
  • Our People
  • Services
  • Services
  • Sectors

Blogs

  • Planning and The Environment
  • Employment Lawyer
  • Family Law
  • Austin Legal UK
  • Morton Fraser Experience
  • Real Estate Comment
  • The Olympic Games Blog
  • Banking & Finance
  • On The Move
 

Posted: Tuesday 27 September 2011

References – Legal Issues

The issue of references is one which I am asked to advise on from time to time as, understandably, employers are concerned regarding possible comeback if, in particular, a negative reference is provided.

From a legal perspective, it has been recognised for some time that an employer’s duty of care extends to cover the provision of references. Case law has established that in order to discharge this duty of care, a reference provided by an employer in respect of a current or former employee must be true, accurate and fair. In a recent case, Jackson v Liverpool City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1068, the Court of Appeal has given further consideration to this issue, addressing the question of what can be included within a reference when there are outstanding allegations in respect of a former employee.

In this case, Mr Jackson alleged that Liverpool City Council, his ex-employer, had been negligent in providing a reference which referred to performance-related allegations against him. Significantly, these allegations had not been investigated by the Council because Mr Jackson had left his employment before the specific issues in question had been identified.

It was initially held that despite the reference being true and accurate in its terms, the Council had breached its duty of care as it was not fair to refer to the allegations against Mr Jackson without an investigation having taken place.

The Court of Appeal took a different view and found no negligence on the part of the Council in terms of the reference it had provided. Accordingly, the appeal was allowed and the decision of the High Court was reversed. Of particular importance to the Court of Appeal’s decision was the fact that the Council had made clear to the recipient of the reference that the allegations in question had not been investigated and that no inference could be drawn either way. This led the Court to conclude that the Council could not be criticised in terms of the reference which it had given since in addition to being true and accurate, it was also fair as it could not be said to be misleading in its terms.

Given the (no doubt expensive) litigation that ensued, this case highlights the continuing importance for employers of proceeding with some caution when providing a reference and of bearing in mind the duty of care which they owe. In particular, when providing a reference in respect of an employee against whom performance - or behaviour - related allegations have been made, while the nature of the allegations can be made known to the recipient of the reference, it must be clearly explained that these have not been investigated and that, as such, no inferences can be drawn.

It is also worth pointing that the case law in this area does not suggest that an employer cannot provide a bad reference, but merely that they owe a duty not to provide a reference which is negligent, that is, one that fails to conform to the required standards of truth, accuracy and fairness.

Due to the consequences faced by an employee (and the potential liability of an employer) of a bad reference it is recommended that employers take advice in the event that they are including information in a reference which is likely to be considered contentious.

Tags: Employment Law - Employees, Employment Law - Employers, Miscellaneous

If you have found this content interesting please share it with your online community using the Share button. Thank you.

<  Return to employment lawyer

Filter by category

  • Absence Management
  • Business
  • Disciplinary Issues
  • Employment Law - Employees
  • Employment Law - Employers
  • Equality & Discrimination
  • Facts & Figures
  • Grievance Issues
  • Health & Safety
  • Individuals & Families
  • Miscellaneous
  • Morton Fraser Information
  • Pensions and Benefits
  • Redundancy
  • SMEs & Owner Managed Companies
  • Social Media
  • Start-Up Companies
  • The Future
  • Unfair Dismissal
 
.. .. .. .. ..
  • Linked-In
  • Twitter
  • Facebook business
  • Facebook You and your family
  • Podcasts
  • EDINBURGH
    0131 247 1000
  • GLASGOW
    0141 274 1100
  • LONDON
    020 7397 8621
  • Sitemap
  • Web Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Business
  • Accessibility
  • Legal

© Morton Fraser 2012
site by tictoc