Morton Fraser

Skip to main content

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Approach and Culture
    • Our History
    • Awards
    • The RGA Trust
    • Interlaw
    • Environmental Policy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • About Us
  • Library
    • Articles
    • Blogs
    • E-Bulletins
    • Factsheets
    • Podcasts
    • Useful links
  • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
    • Deals
    • Business Women's Network
  • Properties For Sale
  • Careers
    • Working at Morton Fraser
    • Equality & Diversity
    • Current Vacancies
    • Legal Traineeships
    • Work Experience
  • Blogs
    • Planning and The Environment
    • Employment Lawyer
    • Family Law
    • Austin Legal UK
    • Morton Fraser Experience
    • Real Estate Comment
    • The Olympic Games Blog
    • Banking & Finance
    • On The Move
  • Contact Us
    • Edinburgh Office
    • Glasgow Office
    • London Office
    • Media/Press
    • Make a Payment
    • How to Find us Online
  • Our People
  • Services
  • Services
  • Sectors

Library

  • Articles
  • Blogs
  • E-Bulletins
  • Factsheets
  • Podcasts
  • Useful links
 

Can the Courts Vary Your Lease?

Posted: Thursday 14 July 2011

Since 1970 the Lands Tribunal for Scotland has been able to discharge or vary “land obligations”.  These are usually thought of as title conditions.  However certain terms of a lease may also be varied.

This was discussed in a very recently reported case involving a dispute between the landlord of the Paisley Centre in Paisley and the Co-operative Wholesale Society, the tenant of a department store.  The tenant wanted to vary or remove the keep open obligation.  The Lands Tribunal could vary the recorded lease only if the condition related to the land.  Unfortunately it is not clear from the judgement whether the keep open clause is one “which relates to the land”.  The Court of Session held that it was a matter for proof whether the keep open clause was a title condition which could be varied by the Lands Tribunal, and sent the case back to the Lands Tribunal for a decision.

The only other relevant case was from 1985 where the court, again on appeal, was very clear that the alienation clause could not be varied by the Lands Tribunal as it simply dealt with who the tenant was and did not relate to the land.

My view is that repair and alterations provisions would relate to land, as they have an effect on what is handed back at the end of the lease, but the argument on use is less strong.  The aim of a restriction on use is often commercial, to benefit the landlord during the lease, rather than relating to land. 

Just because the Lands Tribunal can vary a lease does not mean it will.  It will vary the provision if it is reasonable to grant the application, and considers a number of specified factors.  Those factors mean the Lands Tribunal has a wide discretion.  It is possible that the discretion will be exercised differently in title and lease conditions, but we do not know yet.

What can a landlord do to protect the investment value?  The options are limited for existing leases.  For new leases, or when considering applications for consent to assignation or sub-letting, there are strategies that can be considered which might protect the existing contractual terms?

If you would like to understand more about this or to discuss options relating to your own circumstances please contact Hugh Angus.

You can sign up for regular e-bulletins on a range of legal topics here.

Tags: Construction, Planning & Environmental, Real Estate, Real Estate Construction, Real Estate Litigation

<  Return to articles

If you have found this content interesting please share it with your online community using the Share button. Thank you.

Filter by category

  • Agriculture & Rural Property
  • Arbitration
  • Asset Invoice Finance
  • Banking & Finance
  • Banking - Corporate
  • Banking - Retail
  • Business
  • Charity & Third Sector Law
  • Construction
  • Corporate
  • Data Protection
  • Debt Recovery
  • Disciplinary Issues
  • Employment Law - Employees
  • Employment Law - Employers
  • Energy Utilities
  • Family Law
  • Finance and Investment
  • Food & Drink
  • Fraud & Financial Crime
  • Freedom of Information
  • Health & Safety
  • Healthcare
  • Immigration
  • Immigration - Organisations
  • Individuals & Families
  • Injury Claims for Claimants
  • Insolvency
  • IP & Technology
  • Licensing
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution
  • Miscellaneous
  • Personal Injury & Accident
  • Planning & Environmental
  • Private Client
  • Public Sector
  • Real Estate
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Residential Property
  • Shipping & Aviation
  • SMEs & Owner Managed Companies
  • Sport
  • Start-Up Companies

Related News Stories

  • Neilston Community Joint Venture lifts off
    9 May 2012
  • Alternative Investment Seminar attracts large numbers
    14 Feb 2012
  • Solution to Hedge Rage one step closer
    6 Feb 2012
  • More...

Related Articles

  • L. Batley Pet Products Ltd v. North Lanarkshire Council, 20 December 2011
    11 Jan 2012
  • Roger Jones and Katherine Jones v. William Henderson Gray and Edna Drummond Ross or Gray, 13 December 2011
    11 Jan 2012
  • Legislation
    16 Nov 2011
  • More...

Related Factsheets

  • Planning requirements relaxed
    13 Mar 2012
  • Scottish v English Property Law - a guide to the main practical differences
    22 Nov 2010
  • The Competition Act and land agreements
    19 Nov 2010
  • More...
.. .. .. .. ..
  • Linked-In
  • Twitter
  • Facebook business
  • Facebook You and your family
  • Podcasts
  • EDINBURGH
    0131 247 1000
  • GLASGOW
    0141 274 1100
  • LONDON
    020 7397 8621
  • Sitemap
  • Web Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Business
  • Accessibility
  • Legal

© Morton Fraser 2012
site by tictoc